Table of Contents
- 1 What is Subsidiary Alliance in simple words?
- 2 What was Subsidiary Alliance Class 8?
- 3 What is Subsidiary Alliance explain with example?
- 4 What are the main features of Doctrine of Lapse?
- 5 Why was subsidiary alliance introduced?
- 6 Who introduced the doctrine of lapse?
- 7 Who introduced the Doctrine of Lapse?
- 8 Who ended Doctrine of Lapse?
- 9 What was the purpose of the subsidiary alliance?
- 10 Can a princely ruler form a subsidiary alliance?
What is Subsidiary Alliance in simple words?
Subsidiary Alliance was basically a treaty between the British East India Company and the Indian princely states, by virtue of which the Indian kingdoms lost their sovereignty to the English. It also was a major process that led to the building of the British Empire in India.
What was Subsidiary Alliance Class 8?
– The Subsidiary Alliance was a treaty between the British East India Company and the princely Indian states, which forced the Indian kingdoms to surrender their authority to the English.
What is Subsidiary Alliance explain with example?
Subsidiary alliance was an alliance that the Indian rulers had to form with the British. The Indian rulers had to disband their native army and maintain a British army. They also had to pay for the army by surrendering a piece of their land to the British.
What was Subsidiary Alliance who introduced it?
Lord Wellesley
Subsidiary Alliance System was first introduced by the French East India Company Governor Joseph Francois Dupleix. It was later used by Lord Wellesley who was the Governor-General of India from 1798 to 1805. Early in his governorship, Lord Wellesley adopted a policy of non-intervention in the princely states.
Why was subsidiary Alliance introduced?
The Subsidiary Alliance System was “Non-Intervention Policy” used by Lord Wellesley who was the Governor-General (1798-1805) to establish the British Empire in India. According to this system, every ruler in India had to accept to pay a subsidy to the British for the maintenance of the British army.
What are the main features of Doctrine of Lapse?
Key points of Doctrine of Lapse
- Policy to expand British territory in India on basis of pro-imperialistic approach.
- State must be handed over to British, if they have no heir or ruler.
- Adoptions of child were not accepted for heir.
- Policy was not in support to give title and pension to adopted child of rulers.
Why was subsidiary alliance introduced?
Who introduced the doctrine of lapse?
Lord Dalhousie
Doctrine of lapse, in Indian history, formula devised by Lord Dalhousie, governor-general of India (1848–56), to deal with questions of succession to Hindu Indian states.
What was the purpose of Subsidiary Alliance?
Who introduced the subsidiary alliance and why?
The doctrine of subsidiary alliance was introduced by Lord Wellesley, British Governor-General of India from 1798 to 1805. The Nizam of Hyderabad was the first to enter into such an alliance in 1798.
Who introduced the Doctrine of Lapse?
Who ended Doctrine of Lapse?
The Doctrine of Lapse was finally abandoned by the Raj in 1859, and the tradition of adopting a successor was again recognized. The following sections deal with a few individual princely states and their adopted rulers: 1. Satara.
What was the purpose of the subsidiary alliance?
Subsidiary Alliance was basically a treaty between the British East India Company and the Indian princely states, by virtue of which the Indian kingdoms lost their sovereignty to the English.
Who was responsible for the subsidiary alliance in India?
The subsidiary alliance in India was planned by Lord Wellesley but this term was introduced by French Governor Dupleix An Indian ruler entering into Subsidiary Alliance with the British had to dissolve his own armed forces and accept British forces in his territory. He also had to pay for the British army’s maintenance.
How did Lord Wellesley plan the subsidiary alliance?
Lord Wellesley planned the subsidiary alliance in India. According to this doctrine, an Indian ruler entering into The Subsidiary Alliance with the British had to dissolve his own armed forces and accept British forces in his territory.
Can a princely ruler form a subsidiary alliance?
In a subsidiary alliance, princely rulers were not allowed to make any negotiations and treaty with any other ruler. They were also not allowed to have an independent armed force.